Come join me in the conversation with my colleagues at the SpeechTek 2014 conferencein Marriott Hotel in Time Square, Manhattan New York.
The Panel: C103 – PANEL: The Digital Healthcare Revolution at 1:15 p.m – 2:00 p.m. The panel moderator Bruce Pollock, Vice-President, Strategic Growth and Planning at West Interactive and on Social Media @brucepollock
I will be joined by Daniel Padgett, Director, Voice User Experience at Walgreens and on Social Media at @d_padgett and David Claiborn, Director of Service Experience Innovation at United Health Group.
We will be discussing the opportunities and challenges associated with the current digital healthcare revolution and of course how speech plays an essential role in integrating this technology while maintaining the human component of medicine that we all want. Rather than Neglecting the patient in the era of health IT and EMR
We have progressed from the world of Sir Lancelot Spratt
And the Doctor need to look at the patient not the technology perhaps in a cooperative Digital Health world like this
Is this future of Virtual Assistant Interaction good, desirableDemo Video 140422 from Geppetto Avatars on Vimeo.
We will be discussing
- What are the biggest obstacles to digital healthcare becoming a reality?
- Where do speech technologies bring the most value to healthcare?
- How will health providers, insurers, and payers provide patient support in the world of digital healthcare?
Perhaps the emerging Glass concepts improve this interaction as they are exploring in Seattle
Join us for analysis of the state of digital healthcare today and predictions for its future.
In the end
Come join the discussion as we explore the digital technology and how it should be used in healthcare and how speech can help
I attended a Wearble Technology conference today in Pasadena California: Wearable Tech LA
One of the more interesting concepts takes the challenge we have all faced mastering the mechanics of walking, exercise, running and in some cases rehabilitation by placing sensors in the sole of shoes – Plantiga who have taken force analysis for our feet to a whole new level
The technology takes the static Force Plate sensor and turns into a continuous assessment 3-D tool offering an opportunity to apply this in specific sports and to help rehabilitate people who have been injured or have mechanical challenges (the side effect of capturing all this data is actually creating more comfortable shoes as they now have built in suspension and springs).
It might take a while to arrive in healthcare but in the meantime may well show up as another input device for the X-box or PS3 for a more realistic interface.
There was sensors to be placed all over the body for respiration, heart rate, muscle movement, acceleration/deceleration and even some to be ingested
A major challenge highlighted by several speakers facing all of the wearables genre was the issue of battery life
(and ironically it was the same problem I faced as I tried to capture and post social media)
The opening keynote was from Nadeem Kassam – CEO of BioBeats (Founder of Basis which is now an Intel company). His journey was one of classic rise from poor neighborhood in South Africa where he started his entrepreneur sporty selling oranges
He focused on three lessons – the first an essential learning point for everyone especially those facing healthcare challenges
He also suggested that those looking to succeed with innovation should:
- Look for innovation outside of your industry, and
- Don’t throw a big team or money at innovation
His story behind this was a classic one of engineers told to build a product who came back with his wearable watch that was a huge device that weighed down his arm and had a velcro battery pack under the arm!
He ended up finding his greatest engineers on Craigslist who’s references and Resume was a cardboard box full of devices that he had built.
The new concept of “Adaptive Media” which is bridging the divide between human emotion, data and the media we consume and should adapt to our mood based on our emotion. His new company has done some interesting research programs including an experiment with machines designed to allow people to hear their own heartbeat and have it set to music in Australia. When people heard their heartbeat for the first time it created a deeply emotional experience and many were moved to share very personal life stories.
They took this a step further and worked to gather heartbeats worldwide – a clever BIGData gathering exercise that amassed large quantities of rate, rhythm and details of millions of people around the world.
His overriding point was
There was a fascinating blend of the Entertainment industry and Hollywood and a slew of companies taking different approaches to these devices:
Epihany Eyewear tries to make wearables fashionable as well as functional (I’d say it not so much as fashion but blending into society)
Optivent with powerful wearable glass – but no mention of the interface They probably had the most fun concept videoLes lunettes d’Optinvent voient plus grand que les Google glass from Rennes, Ville et Métropole on Vimeo.
Enlightened design had the most impressive on stage display with a jacket that had lapels that constantly changing color
|Janet Hansen – Founder & Chief Fashion Engineer, Enlightened Designs|
Sporting her jacket with lapels that constantly changed color
Sports and Wearable
Given the excitement over the last month wight he World Cup it was fascinating to hear from Stacey Burr from Adidas who revealed that most if not all the teams were using technology to help them train and track in extensive detail – she suggested that there is not a single team or sport that is not using wearable technology in some form or another.
You can see some of the gear below
|GPS enabled ECG/EKG monitoring Units plug into the back around the neck area|
|Paired with watches to offer players feedback|
|Digital insides of a ball used to sense how well it is struck|
These are the professional versions used by major teams but Adidas is releasing commercial versions that will be available to the general public but lack the GPS capability and the analysis tools they offer
Surprisingly the leaders from a sports and country standpoint are Rugby and Australia and New Zealand who are “light years ahead” of wearable tech in sports
|They are ahead in Psyching out their opponents too!|
Sensoria demonstrated an exciting interactive future for sports and wearables where we challenge ourselves, other people and are coached by virtual assistantsSensoria Fitness Shirt with Heart Rate Sensors from Heapsylon on Vimeo.
One of the highlights:Seeing Dick Fosbury of the “Fosbury Flop” Olympic Gold Medal Winner from Mexico 1968 and it turns out he is a Cancer Survivor, has an aneurysm and fully engaged in the intersection between healthcare and wearable technology
Neil Harbisson – Co-Founder, Cyborg Foundation
who was born totally color blind was definitely at the edge of wearable technology. He has an implanted device that turns color into sound and this is directly fed into his brain. He described that it took 5 weeks for the headaches to stop with this sudden input of data and then 5 months before it just became part of him and he now sees in color. Here’s his TED Talk: I listen in Color http://embed.ted.com/talks/neil_harbisson_i_listen_to_color.htmlHe also has a permanent internet connection in his brain so people cane send him colors and images directly (he joked the address is private – but I did wonder given the ease with which spammers seem to find new addresses how he protects this destination from spam!)
I don’t wear technology I am technology, I can’t tell the difference between the software & my brain
The healthcare focused panel: Emerging Wearable 2.0 Health Platforms:
The furthest along and well know was probably Misfitwearables (Sonny Vu, CEO) who try and make sensors “disappear” but still simple sensors
OMSignal (Jesse Slade Shantz – Chief Medical Officer) was the most interesting as they are trying to change the monitoring from attached sensors to using fabric that can be loose fitting but can capture physiological information.
Breathometer(Charles Michael Yim – CEO) focus on analyzing your breath and have a range of products directed at health (over and above their simplistic alcohol breathalyzer available today) that assessed fat burning (using acetone) and asthma
NeuroSky(Stanley Yang – CEO) offer a system that other manufacturers can integrate into their wearables. Typically found in mobile phones or headsets
LUMO(Monisha Perkash – CEO & Co-founder) offering a discreet sensor that is designed to help improve your body posture and works as a tracker.
It’s an exciting future with some fascinating technology to come – one thing for sure – with ubiquitous technology comes ubiquitous complexity and your voice will become an essential tool for successfully managing and navigating. Dragon Assisatnt is one of several tools built to assist in using and navigating technology that is reinventing the relationship between people and technology
We have some Healthcare reform in the US but we are still challenged with a system that is failing to deliver results. This piece recently: America Ranks No. 1 for Over-Priced, Inefficient Health Care featured the chart from the Commonwealth fund
That ranks the US last in a group of 11 industrialized countries.
As he puts it:
There is one way America is clearly exceptional: we have a healthcare system that is dramatically more expensive than the rest of the industrialized world, but it doesn’t manage to make us any healthier.While the Affordable Care Act attempts to address access it does little to address the cost of the system and the inefficiencies. This does not require a reduction in premiums it needs to address the costs built in to the system that we are all paying for in on form or another
Dr Hans Duvefelt wrote this piece on the healthcare blog: A Swedish Country Doctor’s Proposal for Health Insurance Reform that draws on his personal experience in “socialized medicine, student health, cash-only practices and government-sponsored rural health clinic working for an underserved, underinsured rural population.”
His focus is as a primary care physician but most would agree this is one of the most challenging areas for reform with the shortage in clinicians and low reimbursement rates that is driving doctors out and certainly no encouraging our new generating of clinicians to dive into this essential area.
His main proposals center on basic services that are covered by a flat rate for populations
- Have the insurance company provide a flat rate in the $500/year range to patients’ freely chosen Primary Care Provider, similar to membership fees in Direct Care Medical Practices.
- Provide a prepaid card for basic healthcare, free from billing expenses and administration.
but importantly changing the responsibility and feedback on the cost from a central purchasing authority (the government for example) to the user themselves.
- Unused balances can be rolled over to the following years, letting patients “save” money to cover copays for future elective procedures.
And offers a pathway to specialty care with some appropriate oversight and appriroate levels of reimbursement.
- Keep prior authorizations for big-ticket items, both testing and procedures, if necessary for the health of the system.
- Keep specialty care fee-for-service.
These are clever suggestions and would do much to encourage the patient engagement that will be, as Leonard Kish stated
Patient Engagement is the Blockbuster drug of the century
He rightly points out that the current health “insurance” products are often poorly named – given that insurance that pays and copiers to identify diseases with screening but then stops short of paying to treat conditions and diseases when they are found through that screening. But most of all Insurance should be user driven and priorities and decision left in the hands of the individual and their clinician and not relegated to others who sit in offices emoted from clinical practice and focused on fiscal drivers not on care and quality fo life
Health insurance is not like anything else we call insurance; all other insurance products cover the unexpected and not the expected. Most people never collect on their homeowners’ insurance, and most people never total their car. Health insurance, on the other hand, is expected by many to be like a bumper-to-bumper warranty that insulates us from every misfortune or inconvenience by covering everything from the smallest and most mundane to the most catastrophic or esoteric.
His point about setting of priorities is important – no matter how you cut it there is no unlimited pot of money o resources to treat everything and everybody. These are difficult conversation and ripe for abuse by those with their own agenda’s through fear mongering and use of emotive terms like “Death Panels”.
None of this aspect of reform is simple but it needs to be addressed and included.
The United Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS) may not be perfect but they have started this process of addressing the challenge of allocating resources in an open manner. They developed the the quality-adjusted life years measurement (QALY) out of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). There has been criticism and push back as there will always be but the concept and methodology use is not limited to the UK. While imperfect as Laozi (c 604 bc – c 531 bc) stated: A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step
There is lots of detail in this piece and I would encourage you to go over and read it
Previously posted on HITConsultant
On a recent flight, I had my headphones on and the Rolling Stones’ “Satisfaction”
began to play.
It’s a song I have heard hundreds of times over the years, but I was struck by the difference listening to it with headphones made. With no distractions, I noticed the bass line, in time with the percussion, provides the perfect offset to Mick Jagger’s distinctively strained voice. It was a completely different experience than hearing the track play in the background of a movie or while at a restaurant. Being fully-immersed and listening only to that song allowed me to pick out and appreciate subtle details I had never noticed previously. It’s no surprise that things sound differently when you’re able to concentrate your full attention on what is being said, but as I was sitting there, I became acutely aware of the function headphones serve—they enable the wearer to listen, blocking out distractions.
That is exactly what we are seeking in healthcare and it has proven to be difficult to achieve – in part because of pace, complexity of care, and technology. For centuries, physicians have listened to their patients and relied on their senses— their powers of observation— and matched these insights with clinical experience to heal. Clinicians need to be able to listen and concentrate on what their patient is telling them and noticing those distinctive symptoms he or she may be exhibiting. As Sir William Osler
Being able to dedicate your undivided attention to anything these days is a rarity, but in healthcare, it is a crucial but frequently missing element. The last thing you want to feel when you are at your most vulnerable is that your physician is multi-tasking. Patient satisfaction scores will suffer, but more concerning are the clinical risks and missed opportunities of distracted physicians.
Distracted clinicians are the result of what Dr. Steven Stack of the American Medical Association refers to as an “over-designed” health IT system.” In a recent discussion with industry leaders, he explained that we seem to have become victims of our own ambition. We have devised structures that don’t work for everyone and policies that create very real, very expensive consequences for those who don’t abide. And this has left physicians stretched too thin, trying to do more in less time without any direct impact on improving their ability to care for their patients.
So, maybe it’s time we scale back. Dr. John Halamka, CIO of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and co-chair of the nation HIT Standards Committee, noted that while we are in this period of transition and growth, we need to focus on parsimony, or determining the smallest number of moving parts that need to be adjusted in order to create seamlessness in HIT. Quite simply put, while the cart has been upset, there is no reason to trample all over the apples.
The MIT Technology Review recently interviewed Sarah Lewis, a doctoral candidate at Yale, about her recent book that explores how different unlikely circumstances or paths, like failure, have often spurred innovation. Citing creative geniuses such as Cezanne and Beethoven to Nobel laureates, she defines failure as the gap between where one is and where one would like to be. Confronting this gap, she asserts, is important because it “lets people go deep with their failure while letting it be an entrepreneurial endeavor if they like, or an innovative discovery.” We, in health IT, are currently at that gap where there is a disparity between where we are and where we would like to be.
The recent ICD-10 delay has provided the perfect opportunity for us to find Halamka’s parsimony, leveraging solutions that work for physicians and creating consistency and impact wherever possible. Like medicine itself, there will be no one perfect solution for every physician or organization, but we need to begin finding things that work – from re-skinning EHRs with easy to use tools like single sign-on or mobility to systems that respond to voice, touch or swipe to improve the experience for clinicians and patients. We need to start thinking of health IT more like headphones, coming in different styles to suit preferences, but providing the same function of reducing distraction and enabling the clinician to focus on the inflections in their patients’ voices, and truly hearing what is being said.
As Mick Jagger poignantly remarked, “The past is a great place and I don’t want to erase it … but I don’t want to be its prisoner, either.” We have accomplished a lot, but it is time to learn from the past and break free from what isn’t working. I think we can get health IT satisfaction (despite what the song says), but to do so we must all be engaged in the design, delivery, and re-imagination of healthcare and its intersection with technology. This truly is the art of medicine and we are all virtuosos contributing to the next masterpiece of healthcare.
I have the privilege of spending a lot of time on the road interacting with clinicians around the country (and world). I hear with too much frequency many doctors complaining about the Electronic Medical Record and how it fails to help them and in many cases makes their work harder. Some of this is a hangover from the past and the inadequate technology and in some cases hardware at the time In fact I’ve told this story a number of times that I can date to around 1995/6 and in this piece: Clinical documentation in the EHR
Many years ago, an excited friend who worked for one of the electronic health record (EHR) vendors at that time — it was really more of a billing and patient tracking and management system than an EHR — was desperate to show me some of their latest applications. In particular, a new module they had developed to capture clinical data. My friend pulled out his laptop, fired up the application, selected a patient and proceeded to enter blood pressure (BP). Some 20-plus clicks later, he had entered a BP of 120/80. While he was excited, I was dumbfounded. When it comes to patient care, doctors didn’t have time for 20 clicks to record BP years ago and they definitely don’t have that luxury in today’s demanding medical environment.
There is still some of that going on and not enough focus on the User Interface design and turning the technology into a barrier – this is the focus of the Art of Medicine campaign we launched some weeks ago
This article on Government HealthIT Are electronic health records already too cluttered? highlights a rising problem and one I hear about frequently. This is not just a healthcare problem and it is the focus of the work by Edward Tufte an American statistician and professor emeritus of political science, statistics, and computer science at Yale University who is well known for his books on information design which are bets acquired by attending one of his frequent courses on data visualization Here is a recent overview of visualization on the iPhone
He has a section on healthcare but many of his principles apply
For Brian Jacobs the problem was even more acute working in a Pediatric ICU:
The ICU is a very toxic and tech-laden environment….because of that, it offers the opportunity to make a lot of mistakes
As he points out much of the cutter derives form the multiple notes entered into the EHR every day. “It’s not uncommon in teaching hospitals to have six to seven notes per day on one patient, by the time the attending physician, residents, consultants, other doctors and fellows check on the patient.” So they instituted a policy of One Note per day
It’s actually one note per team per patient per day; one giant multi-contributor note. They still may be all writing their components, but it’s one note
With a template to hold the content generated each morning by the resident and then everyone contributing to that one note, adding and amending as necessary
So in addressing the issue clutter they also addressed usability and design turning the note into a living breathing document that is updated and maintained by the team that now takes care of patients But he addressed some other important issues – especially when it comes to quality of care and the quality of the medical note
Copy Forward is subject to some warranted scrutinyfrom a billing and audit standpoint. Much of the repetitive and “clutter” in the note comes form the copying forward of past information. But:
These notes should never be the same
And as part of that message they moved to an “End-of-day note” that was a fresh summary of the patient. Add to that an updated and well maintained Problem List and integration with the billing system to allow doctors to select their code for the work carried out that day and they moved to a valuable addition to the healthcare team in delivering quality healthcare with their EHR
EHRs are: more complete, legible, accessible and can be auto-populated and searched. They can provide diagnosis codes and they’re good for billing. On the other hand, they can sometimes lack quality information and are by far, too cluttered.
I said this back in 2003 (yikes!) – The Future of Technology is already here – Who’s on Board the train and who’s left at the station. I still believe it and understand that the technology does need to get better and be more integrated into the existing workflow
This Survey: Do Patients Really Care if You Use Your EHR in the Exam Room? was very revealing. It turns out contrary to the perception that the intrusion of EMR’s in the office patients prefer electronic documentation to alternatives
Most Patients Don’t Mind Electronic Note-Taking During Exams
In each case, more than 80 percent of respondents indicated they would not be bothered. On a sliding scale, patients indicated the least concern for doctors using tablets during the exam.
What was more surprising was the push back by patients on having scribes
But worst of all – recording devices
Ultimately, over one-third of patients said they’d be bothered by doctors using tape recorders to assist in charting medical notes. Specifically, patients at the furthest end of the spectrum—those who chose “would bother me a lot”—were more prevalent when it came to tape recordings than with any other method of charting during an exam.
There was a big preference to Electronic documentation at the point of care
They asked about reasons for dissatisfaction
Its not the technology that causes the dissatisfaction but in order of importance (for patients)
- long wait times at the doctor’s office,
- unfriendly staff
- short duration of visits with the doctor
- Trouble Scheduling Appointment
And coming in with a sliver of dissatisfaction at 5% “Doctor using a Computer in the exam room”
The main points highlighted
- The mortality rate fell by about 17 percent from 1968 through 2010, years for which we have detailed data…Almost all of this improvement can be attributed to improved survival prospects for males
- The surge in for 25- to 44-year-olds was caused by AIDS, which at its peak, killed more than 40,000 Americans a year (more than 30,000 of whom were 25 to 44 years old)
- AIDS was the single biggest killer of Americans who should otherwise have been in the prime of their lives (Sobering Statistic)
- 45- to 54-year-olds are less likely to die from disease, they have become much more likely to commit suicide or die from drugs
- How does suicide and drugs compare to other violent deaths across the population? Far greater than firearm related deaths, and on the rise. (Suicide and has recently become the number one violent cause of death) – (Sad Statistic)
- The downside of living longer is that it dramatically increases the odds of getting dementia or Alzheimer’s
- The rise of Alzheimer’s and other forms of dementia has had a big impact on health-care costs because these diseases kill their victims slowly. About 40 percent of the total increase in Medicare spending since 2011 can be attributed to greater spending on Alzheimer’s treatment
They do a great job of slicing the data by cohorts of age groups showing how much we have improved mortality and how our 25 and under age group is benefiting from the health improvements with the lower mortality and higher life expectancy than any other cohrot
In an interesting post on the medscape site (subscription/registration probably required): The Pitfalls of Giving Free Advice to Family and FriendsShelly Reese described some of the challenges of giving medical advice
to friends and family (even if you are a wannabe Dr Phil).
As she puts it the path can sometimes lead to challenging areas of ethics and professional boundaries.
How do you address or deflect such requests? Unfortunately, there are no easy answers. It depends a lot on you, your boundaries, and the situation.
And she links to the AMA Guidelines
The American Medical Association (AMA) Code of Medical Ethics is clear, however: “Physicians generally should not treat themselves or members of their immediate families.” The statement goes on to provide an extensive list of good reasons why, including personal feelings that may unduly influence medical judgment, difficulty discussing sensitive topics during a medical history, and concerns over patient autonomy (Ref: American Medical Association. Code of Medical Ethics Opinion 8.19: Self-treatment or treatment of immediate family members. Issued June 1993.)
Some of the challenges of simple advice include
- Escalation to more complex or persistent advice
- Long distance diagnosis with missing data
- Lack of Doctor/Patient relationship and documentation
- Impaired judgement
- Changing and coloring of relationships
In one section she describes the challenges of dealing with family members and says
“I try not to give too much medical advice, even to my parents. I see my role as an advocate: to help them synthesize information when they have questions. When my mother calls and says, ‘I’m short of breath and I don’t know what to do,’ I walk her through all the things her doctor has talked to her about: Have you taken your blood pressure and pulse? Do you know how many times you’re breathing per minute?”
Good advice on being the patient advocate and healthcare manager for your family members (which many already are) In the end it boils down to personal judgement and your own boundaries.
Questions are appropriate and to be expected, Caplan says, but doctors have to wrestle with themselves in determining how to respond if they’re to act responsibly and ethically. “When close friends and family ask for medical advice, that’s always a matter for introspection, and at the end of the day, it’s not resolved by codes of ethics but by considered individual judgments.”
It used to be as the trusted source of knowledge where access to information was limited this was a significant responsibility but with the age of
and medical applications like AskMD, iTriage and HealthTap to mention a few you might find there is fewer and fewer requests. So for those of you that like the opportunity to help others out…enjoy it while you can mHealth and Telemedicine may be changing the landscape and soon!
HIMSS was exciting and despite the HIS Talk HISies awarding Google Glass the most over rated technology:
I know I am biased as one of the lucky Google Glass Explorer as can be seen in this post from MedCity Watching for Wearables at #HIMSS14:
I think they are wrong and its not just Glass that will provide better more ready access to essential clinical data.
Not to say that the initial program like many launches have had their problems with early releases of technology not quite ready for prime time – remember the 1987 Apple Newton:
Even the omnipresent iPad struggled initially – most have probably forgotten the initial lukewarm reception of the iPad
had Apple talking about a price reduction.
- Glass is socially awkward
- People get angry at Glass
- Wearing Glass separates you
and I would add Glass interrupts normal conversations and social behavior – but that is all now and like the mobile phone I believe it will be come a natural part of our technical fabric. Think back to 2007 and how pulling out a phone in a meeting was frowned upon – now it seems part of the fabric of many of the meetings I attend. But it was Mat’s commentary on the impact it had on his perception fo phones that really stuck out for me
Glass kind of made me hate my phone — or any phone. It made me realize how much they have captured our attention. Phones separate us from our lives in all sorts of ways. Here we are together, looking at little screens, interacting (at best) with people who aren’t here. Looking at our hands instead of each other. Documenting instead of experiencing.
Which resonates with me an the Art of Medicine campaign and the struggle clinicians have with focusing on the patient (To learn more, download the eGuide Art of Medicine in a digital world). As Dr. Edward C. Grendys, Jr. said in his article: There’s no room for technology in end-of-life care decisions:
From initial diagnosis through to surgical therapies, chemotherapy treatments and even end-of-life care, my job is to listen, assess and provide educated decisions that ultimately impact the health and wellness of another human being…. it’s my belief that when talking face-to-face with a patient about a care plan aimed at eradicating their body of a disease that threatens to take them away from their family, there’s no room for paper, computers and/or mobile devices. In these most intimate of conversations, the focus has always and must remain on the communication between the caregiver and the patient on the receiving end. That, in its purest essence, is what practicing the art of medicine is truly all about.
That’s not to say that Google Glass can solve this problem and in its current state and acceptance it might cause more challenges – but the potential is there to blend information access and capture into a physician patient interaction that remains all about the patient
Glass will provide improved access to essential clinical data to clinicians but as my friend Chuck Webster has pointed out on several occasions this is not just for clinicians. Patients are already accessing the internet in droves for clinical information, researching their conditions and that of their relatives and communities abound with resources and support for conditions from common to rare.
Before talking about some of the potential medical applications it is worth detailing the technology. Google Glass is basically a computer with 12Gb of memory attached to your head in the form of glasses. It has a heads up display with voice activation and has some apps that can be installed:
- Google Glass is basically a computer attached to a pair of glasses
- Google Glass has a display that is projected in front of the Right Eye that is a high resolution display equivalent of a 25 inch high definition screen from eight feet away
- Google Glass has a camera that points forward and can take pictures (5MP) or video (720p) that is closely aligned with the view you see from your own eyes
- Google Glass is voice activated using speech recognition to interact with the glass computer
- Google Glass works best when connected to the internet
- Google Glass Integrates with an Andorid Phone with a limited set of functions available for the iPhone
- Google Glass has no built in illumination so pictures or video taken in dark conditions do not work well
- The screen can be hard to see in bright light
There are many myths circulating:
- If someone is wearing Google Glass they are recording me
- False – The device is not set up to record continuously and will only record a video or photo based on an action by the wearer (either a spoken request
- OK Glass, take a picture
- or by pressing a button on the google glass device
- Once Someone Has recorded something on Google Glass it is Publicly Posted
- False – it requires an action on the part of the Glass owner to post the material to the internet otherwise it resides on the Google Glass device. It will be synchronized with the users Google+ account for automatic backup (much like photos are backed up from the iPhone to iCloud but like iCloud remain private to the user unless they elect to share them)
- Google Glass is constantly capturing data and transmitting it to the Internet
- False. Without an internet connection Google Glass simply stores any recorded information in the glass memory. And unless you have set it to record there is no data being captured
- Google Glass tracks users and unsuspecting bystanders
- False – Google Glass is not tracking or recording anything unless instructed to do so by the user
So who is using this technology, where are they using it and how are they using it in Healthcare. This articlecovered some of the early concepts and featured a short list of potential applications
- Video sharing and storage: Physicians could record medical visits and store them for future reference or share the footage with other doctors.
- A diagnostic reference: If Glass is integrated with an electronic medical record (EMR), it could provide a real-time feed of the patient’s vital signs.
- A textbook alternative: Rather than referring to a medical textbook, physicians can perform a search on the fly with their Google Glass.
- Emergency room/war zone care: As storied venture capitalist Marc Andreessen proposed in a recent interview, consider ”dealing with wounded patients and right there in their field of vision, if they’re trying to do any kind of procedure, they’ll have step-by-step instructions walking them through it.” In a trauma situation, doctors need to keep their hands free.
- Helping medical students learn: As suggested by one blogger, a surgeon might live stream a live — and potentially rare — surgery to residents and students.
- Preventing medical errors: With an electronic medical record integration, a nurse can scan the medication to confirm whether it’s the correct drug dose and right patient
In its simplest form just transmitting images in real time can offer some advantages for diagnosis – in Rhode Island they are planning on implementing Google Glass for the ED doctors to obtain real time consults with dermatologists.
And this from Kareo showing a patient education application that records the physician patient interaction and then makes it available afterwards for additional review:
In this case featured in the ER doctors use Google Glass and QR codes to identify patients which featured Dr. John Halamka, CIO of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center which he talked about in his blog detailing their experience (oddly the articletalking about this refers to text that appears to have been changed or taken down):
When a clinician walks into an emergency department room, he or she looks at [a] bar code (a QR or Quick Response code) placed on the wall. Google Glass immediately recognizes the room and then the ED Dashboard sends information about the patient in that room to the glasses, appearing in the clinician’s field of vision. The clinician can speak with the patient, examine the patient, and perform procedures while seeing problems, vital signs, lab results and other data.
And this concept by the way was top of everyone’s wish list that I talked to in my unofficial survey of engaged and interested observers of my own pair. I’ll paraphrase
If I could get it to recognize someone and provide me with their name when I meet them that would be fantastic!
But it is in urgent care where there is so much potential:
This recent piece on Healium featured in the Seattle King5 News Station: Seattle Doctor testing Google Glass for Surgery in the ER (click on the link if the video does not show below to see it in action)
“If I want to look at for example radiology I can double tap ‘radiology…There’s his chest x-ray, it just popped up, oh he’s got a middle lobe pneumonia”
Part 2 will cover medical applications and how Google Glass technology can be applied in a busy clinical setting